Topic focus: Architect decision-making when designing commercial restrooms with touchless fixtures, with special attention to automatic soap dispensers and multifeed-ready planning.
What Architects Consider First: Project Type & Traffic
Before choosing any specific touchless fixture, architects typically classify the restroom by:
- Traffic level: low (small offices), medium (multi-tenant buildings), or high (airports, stadiums, malls).
- Visibility: back-of-house vs. front-of-house vs. premium/flagship areas.
- Operations model: in-house janitorial team vs. outsourced service, and their refill capabilities.
- Owner standards: brand guidelines, ESG commitments, and durability expectations.
Choosing a Touchless “Family”: Faucets, Soap & Drying
Architects rarely choose touchless soap dispensers in isolation. Instead, they select an integrated family:
- Sensor faucets (lavatory)
- Automatic soap dispensers (deck- or wall-mounted)
- Hand-drying (high-speed dryers or towel dispensers)
- Occasionally, integrated sink systems that house all three
Key selection criteria for the fixture family
- Visual consistency: matching finishes and geometries across water, soap, and drying hardware.
- Sensor reliability: stable activation in real-world lighting and water conditions.
- Power source: battery or hardwired, and if it can handle future upgrades like multifeed soap systems.
- Revit/BIM support: models that help you coordinate in 3D. A banner-style picture of a commercial vanity with matching touchless faucets and soap dispensers that work on their own.
Soap Dispensers: The Fixture That Drives Daily Operations
From the architect’s point of view, soap dispensers are where hygiene design and operations meet. Even the most beautiful faucet layout fails if dispensers run dry, clog, or are difficult to refill. For this reason, architects often ask:
- How often will dispensers need refilling at projected traffic levels?
- Can maintenance staff access refills from above the counter, or only from below?
- Is there a path to bulk or multifeed systems if the building scales up?
Individual Reservoir vs. Multifeed: The Architect’s Trade-Off
One of the biggest strategic decisions is whether to specify soap dispensers with:
- Individual reservoirs at each dispenser, or
- A centralized multifeed system feeding several dispensers from a shared tank (as with Fontana’s multifeed concept).
Why architects often lean toward multifeed-ready design
- Future-proofing: the first phase may use separate tanks, but the casework and space under the counter are made to hold a bulk tank later.
- Operational savings: centralized filling can cut down on the number of hours worked in restrooms with a lot of traffic.
- Less cluttered under-sink area: fewer bottles and containers that aren’t needed.
- Consistency: all sinks on a run have the same type and amount of soap, which makes the experience better for users.
Balancing Aesthetics, Brand & User Experience
Beyond mechanics, architects must ensure that soap dispensers visually support the brand. This affects:
- Finish: chrome for standard cores, matte black or brushed gold for premium areas, stainless for utilitarian zones.
- Form: minimalist spouts in tech offices, more sculptural forms in hospitality or retail flagships.
- Perceived cleanliness: integrated fixtures with fewer exposed seams read as more hygienic.
How Architects Turn All This into a Specification
In practice, architects translate all of these considerations into a small number of clearly defined fixture types in the construction documents:
- Define restroom types: core, premium, public concourse, staff-only, etc.
- Assign a fixture “family” to each type: faucet + soap + drying from the same or coordinated manufacturers.
- Set soap strategy: cartridge, bulk-fill, or multifeed-ready depending on traffic and operations.
- Coordinate with MEP: power, access panels, and any centralized tanks or controllers.
- Document details: finish codes, flow rates, soap types, and mounting heights in schedules and enlarged plans.
No responses yet